Weighting for Returns
Posted in Size Effect
March 15, 2005
In his December 2004 paper, Jason Hsu shows that: “Cap-Weighted Portfolios Are Sub-optimal Portfolios”. Noting that over $10 trillion are currently invested in passive capitalization-weighted indices, he examines data from 1962-2003 to show that:
- Weighting a portfolio according to capitalization introduces bias for overpriced stocks and against underpriced stocks.
- A portfolio weighted by book value, income or sales outperforms a comparable capitalization-weighted portfolio by roughly 2% per year, with similar volatility and therefore higher Sharpe ratio. (see chart below.)
- Given comparable turnovers among portfolios, the higher returns of alternatives are economically significant to investors.
In summary, capitalization-weighted portfolios/funds are inherently underperforming.
You May Also Enjoy...
- Traditional Beta and Capitalization Weighting Under Attack
- A Drag on Capitalization-weighted Portfolios?
- Performance of Fundamental-weighted Indexes in Europe
- Cross Sections of Covered Call Returns
Why not subscribe to our premium content?
It costs less than a single trading commission. Learn more here.
It costs less than a single trading commission. Learn more here.
