Objective research and reviews to aid investing decisions | Saturday, February 11, 2012 | S&P 500 (SPY) 134.36 -1.00 | Gold (GLD) 167.14 -0.88

Scared by Randomness?

Posted in Animal Spirits, Individual Investing

 

How often should an investor/trader check the performance of their positions? Does it make a difference (psychologically) whether one checks frequently or infrequently? In their 2005 paper entitled “The Scaling Property of Randomness: The Impact of Reporting Frequency on The Perceived Performance of Investment Funds”, Nigel Finch, Guy Ford, Suresh Cuganesan and Tyrone Carlin use actual investment fund performance data to explore the likelihood that an investor would have viewed the performance as positive or negative based on sampling frequency. Applying prospect theory (a loss in wealth has a negative impact 2.25 times greater in magnitude than the positive impact of a gain in wealth) to data for four large Australian investment funds (see table below), they conclude that:

  • The shorter the sampling interval, the lower the probability (approaching 50%) that a fund will show a gain. (See the second table below.)
  • Fund holders checking their balances at intervals of less than approximately one month are likely to have negative feelings about their investments.
  • Fund holders checking their balances at quarterly or annual intervals are very likely to have positive feelings about their investments.
  • Funds that want to hold onto their investors should report as infrequently as feasible.

The following table, taken from the paper, profiles the four Australian funds used in the test. All have five-star Morningstar ratings as of the test date, showing relatively high average annual returns and relatively low volatility.

The next table, also taken from the paper, shows the probability of seeing a gain in fund value by sampling interval (assuming underlying distributions of returns are normal). Sampling intervals tested range from one second to one year. For example, the probability of seeing a gain after a randomly selected one-minute interval is just barely over 50% for all four funds. The probability of seeing a gain after a randomly selected one-year interval is at least 95% for all four funds.

In summary, investors/traders who check investment performance frequently should make mental adjustments for pain-avoidance bias.

You May Also Enjoy...

Why not subscribe to our premium content?
It costs less than a single trading commission. Learn more here.
Login
Current Momentum Winners

Among nine asset class ETFs/Cash through January 2012, the six-month momentum winner is…

TLT

See “Simple Asset Class ETF Momentum Strategy


Among nine sector ETFs through January 2012, the six-month momentum winner is…

XLU

See “Simple Sector ETF Momentum Strategy


Among six style ETFs through  January 2012, the six-month momentum winner is…

IWF

See “Doing Momentum with Style (ETFs)

Guru Grades
Investing Demons
 
Recent Blog Posts
Recent Guru Updates
 
About CXODisclaimerPrivacy PolicyContact CXO
© 2004-2012 CXO Advisory Group, LLC. All Rights Reserved.