Objective research and reviews to aid investing decisions
Our Test Strategy attempts to exploit the value premium, the size effect, the turn-of-the-month effect and the volatility premium embedded in index options. The strategy has outperformed buy-and-hold, achieving a small gain during a mostly declining market over the past 16 months. How has each premium/effect contributed to strategy performance? Using strategy account and benchmark data over the period 3/16/07 through 7/11/08, we find that:
We calculate the four premiums/effects as average (arithmetic mean) impacts on monthly returns as follows:
The following chart summarizes the sizes of the four premiums/returns as monthly averages over the 16-month test period. The value premium, size effect and turn-of-the-month effect are all negative. The volatility premium is very positive.
A possible conclusion is that it would be better just to focus on the volatility premium. However, sample size is too small for reliable inference, and the sizes of the four premiums/effects may be interrelated. For example, the volatility premium may have been smaller for SPY than for IWN over the test period.

In summary, a very positive volatility premium has more than offset a negative value premium, negative size effect and negative turn-of-the-month effect for our test strategy over the past 16 months.
For additional information, see Strategy Test.