Objective research to aid investing decisions
Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for February 2026 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY
Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for February 2026 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Multi-year ETF Momentum

Steve LeCompte | | Posted in: Momentum Investing

Key Insight

ETF momentum strategy outperformed with VW 3-year lookback generating 1.25% monthly return vs underperforming EW approach (Aug 2004–Jun 2018; long top decile, short bottom decile; 50–396 ETFs).

Do U.S. equity exchange-traded funds (ETF) exhibit long-term momentum? In their October 2019 paper entitled “ETF Momentum”, Frank Li, Melvyn Teo and Chloe Yang investigate future performance of U.S. equity ETFs sorted on multi-year past returns. Each month starting August 2004, they:

  1. Sort selected ETFs into tenths (deciles) based on returns over the past two, three or four years, with focus on three years.
  2. Reform an equal-weighted (EW) or value-weighted (VW) portfolio that is long (short) the decile with the highest (lowest) past returns, with focus on value-weighted.

They then evaluate performances of deciles and long-short portfolios based on raw return, 4-factor (adjusting for market, size, book-to-market and momentum) alpha and 5-factor (replacing momentum with profitability and investment) alpha. Using monthly returns, market capitalizations and net asset values for all U.S. equity ETFs with capitalizations greater than $20 million and share price greater than one dollar during August 2000 through June 2018, they find that:

  • At the start (end) of the sample period, there are 50 (396) qualifying U.S. equity ETFs.
  • In general (see the chart below):
    • Long-short multi-year momentum portfolios generate substantially positive returns.
    • The optimal long-short VW portfolio based on past 3-year returns generates average gross monthly return 1.25%, gross monthly 4-factor alpha 1.20% and gross monthly 5-factor alpha 1.28%.
    • EW long-short portfolios materially underperform VW portfolios, suggesting that the largest ETFs drive the effect.
  • However, returns are volatile, discouraging to traders with short investment horizons.
  • Neither cross-sectional stock momentum, macroeconomic variables nor liquidity explain multi-year ETF momentum.
  • Findings are generally robust to:
    • Estimated monthly portfolio rebalancing frictions.
    • Extending the long-short portfolio holding period from one to three, six, nine or 12 months (with overlapping portfolios).
    • Using returns calculated from ETF net asset values (NAV) rather than ETF prices.

The following chart, constructed from data in the paper, summarizes performance of long-short multi-year ETF momentum portfolios for both weighting schemes and all three lookback intervals. Results show that the optimal combination is VW with 3-year lookback interval.

In summary, evidence suggests that U.S. equity ETFs exhibit multi-year momentum.

Cautions regarding findings include:

  • The sample period is extremely short for testing the specified strategy. For example, the full sample period has fewer than five independent 4-year lookback intervals.
  • Average monthly return is not sufficient to assess strategy attractiveness. Many investors are concerned about return variability (Sharpe ratio) and maximum drawdown.
  • As tested, portfolios hold too many assets in later years for most individual investors.
  • Testing multiple lookback intervals and weighting schemes on the same data introduces data snooping bias, such that the best results (VW with 3-year lookback) overstates expectations.
  • The specified setup may not work for ETFs tracking asset classes other than U.S. equities.