Evidence-based investing research
Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for November 2026 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY
Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for November 2026 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Look-ahead Bias in Option Trading Backtests

Steve LeCompte | | Posted in: Equity Options

Guide Options and Leveraged ETFs Other option research

Key Insight

Correcting look-ahead bias cut average gross monthly returns in two option strategies (stock-characteristic strategy, profitability example: 2.27% to 0.10%, Jan 2012–Jun 2020; liquidity strategy, calls: 1.52% to 0.19%, Jan 1996–Apr 2016; replication vs. feasible versions).

Numerous option trading studies report finding strategies with remarkably high mean returns and Sharpe ratios. Are these findings too good to be true? In their October 2023 paper entitled "Too Good to Be True: Look-ahead Bias in Empirical Option Research", Jefferson Duarte, Christopher Jones, Mehdi Khorram and Haitao Mo investigate the extent to which look-ahead bias drives extraordinarily high average returns and Sharpe ratios in two distinct option strategies: one based on stock characteristics (January 2012 through June 2020), and the other associated with liquidity provision in the options market (January 1996 through April 2016). They first replicate the strategies as published, and then recast the strategies with careful attention to what information is reliably available before trading. Using data over the above sample periods required to replicate and correct the original studies, they find that:

Subscribe to Keep Reading

Get the research edge serious investors rely on.

  • 1,200+ research articles
  • Monthly strategy signals
  • 20+ years of backtested analysis
$17.99 /month

Cancel anytime

Options and Leveraged ETFs guide

More on other option research

  • Historical U.S. Equity Returns for a 5-Year Horizon Premium Rolling 5-year nominal returns were negative about 22% of the time for both Shiller's S&P Composite Index (total return, 1871–2025; 149 overlapping intervals) and…
  • How Are Laddered Buffer ETFs Doing? Premium Five laddered buffer ETFs had lower CAGRs than SPY or QQQ (equal-weighted average 9.9% vs 14.4%) but shallower monthly MaxDDs (-12% vs -24%) (sample…
  • Half-day Momentum and Reversal in Stock Options Premium U.S. stock option returns show half-day momentum at even lags and reversal at odd lags, with daily long-short deciles earning 0.22% (intraday) and 0.45%…
  • Signals from Trading Volumes of Informed Traders Premium The INFO factor (long top/short bottom decile of equal-weighted stocks ranked monthly on insider net purchases, short interest, and option/stock volume) returned 1.12% gross…
  • Equity Options Trading Frictions Premium Identical market orders placed across six brokers averaged 3.9% round-trip frictions relative to position size, ranging from about 0% (Vanguard) to 7% (Robinhood) and…

All 195 articles in the Options and Leveraged ETFs guide