Evidence-based investing research
Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for November 2026 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY
Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)
Allocations for November 2026 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Distortion/Bias in LLM Summaries of Text

Steve LeCompte | | Posted in: Investing Expertise

Key Insight

LLM summaries of S&P 500 10-K risk factors omit 59%–73% of the top-1,000 most distinctive source terms and inject novel terms making up 15%–35% of summary language (GPT-4o-mini, Grok-3-mini, Phi-4, Llama-3.3-70B; 2005–2024; descriptive).

Large language models (LLM) have quickly become a standard tool for extracting quantitative metrics from unstructured text. Are these metrics more like new data or a biased filter? In the July 2026 revision of their paper entitled "LLMs and Systematic Measurement Error", William Grieser, Anthony Cookson, Maryam Fathollahi and Eshwar Venugopal examine how LLMs process text and thereby introduce errors of omission and injection. The authors then examine how LLM omission and injection rates influence summaries of firm risk disclosures and earnings call transcripts. Using four widely used models (GPT-4o-mini, Grok-3-mini, Phi-4, Llama-3.3-70B) to summarize annual Form 10-K, Item 1A risk factor disclosures and quarterly earnings call transcripts of S&P 500 firms during 2005 through 2024, they find that:

Read this study free

The rest of this study: 290 words.

Enter your email and we’ll send you a link to this article. 3 premium articles a month, no password or card.