Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for April 2024 (Final)

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for April 2024 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Formal Asset Allocation with Price Trending

| | Posted in: Strategic Allocation

Should investors consider a broader framework to encompass trend-following/momentum investing strategies? In his March 2013 paper entitled “Asset Price Trend Theory: Reframing Portfolio Theory from the Ground Up”, Robert Dubois presents a portfolio allocation strategy that explicitly includes an assumption that asset prices trend (exhibit return autocorrelation or intrinsic momentum). His approach augments risk management by including stop-loss protocols to exit allocations to some assets/strategies based on their trends relative to specified thresholds. He defines three strategic allocation segments: (RB1) risk-free assets; (RB2) liquid risky assets/strategies subject to stop-loss exits at the asset and/or portfolio level; and, (RB3) both liquid and illiquid risky assets not subject to stop-loss exits. All three segments are subject to asset/strategy selection, position sizing and entry rules. RB2 arguably allows strong risk management (containment) via trend-related removal of exposure to risky assets with below-trend performance. Elaborating on this framework, he concludes that:

  • A first step is to allocate funds across RB1, RB2 and RB3 (see the figure below), potentially including a minimum value for RB1 as a definitive total portfolio value floor and a rebalancing discipline.
  • Shifting weight from RB3 to RB2 (and perhaps RB1) increases emphasis on risk containment.
    • The investor may be able to exploit strong emphasis on risk containment by selecting aggressive assets/strategies and stop-loss exits for RB2.
    • Investors choosing not to emphasize risk containment via large allocations to RB2 can moderate risk by selecting conservative assets/strategies for RB3.
  • Focus then shifts to selection of component assets/strategies to populate RB2 and RB3.

The following figure, taken from the paper, depicts simply the three proposed strategic allocation segments:

  • RB1: risk-quarantined, consisting of assets such as short-term U.S. Treasuries, money market funds and certificates of deposit up to insured limits.
  • RB2: capital at risk subject to stop-loss risk containment designed to exploit predictable price trending, such as exchange-traded assets or strategies built from such assets.
  • RB3: capital irrevocably deployed and fully at risk (buy and hold), potentially including liquid assets and especially relatively illiquid assets such as real estate, art and collectibles and locked-up hedge funds and private equity.


In summary, investors may want to consider a three-segment portfolio, with one segment focused on active risk management based on belief in the exploitability of asset price trends.

Cautions regarding conclusions include:

  • The arguments in the paper are qualitative, not mathematically specified or derived.
  • The paper does not examine empirical outcomes associated with the proposed allocation framework.
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)