Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for May 2024 (Final)

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for May 2024 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Two Biggest Mistakes of Long-term Investors

| | Posted in: Big Ideas, Strategic Allocation

How can long-term investors maximize their edge of strategic patience? In their November 2011 paper entitled “Investing for the Long Run”, Andrew Ang and Knut Kjaer offer advice on successful long-term investing (such as by pension funds).  They define a long-term investor as one having no material short-term liabilities or liquidity demands. Using the California Public Employee’s Retirement System and other large institutions as examples, they conclude that:

  • Long-term investors can:
    • Ride out short-term fluctuations in returns.
    • Exploit instances of short-term mispricing.
    • Exploit high-premium illiquidity. 
  • The two biggest mistakes of long-term investors are:
    1. Procyclical tactical reallocation (shifting portfolio weights in the same direction as relative past performance instead of rebalancing to fixed weights or reallocating in a contrarian manner).
    2. Accepting investment manager/advisor goals (short-term performance fees) in conflict with a long horizon and “fake skills” that obscure risk.
  • Long‐horizon investors should:
    • Be rigorously contrarian by strict rebalancing to fixed portfolio weights, or more  aggressively, to weights dynamically set by robust valuation‐based rules.
    • Focus on diversification across socioeconomic factors (such as inflation, economic growth and political risk) and investment factors (such as value‐growth and momentum) rather than asset classes.
    • Upgrade their own investment competence (understanding risk and reward) to support incentivizing, monitoring and evaluating investment managers/advisors.
    • Demand elevated returns for illiquid investments as compensation for associated constraints on rebalancing.

In summary, evidence from institutional experience suggests that long-term investors should be contrarian, diversified across factors (anomalies) more than asset classes and knowledgeable enough to set long-horizon incentives for investment managers/advisors.

Though presented in institutional context, the advice likely applies to individual investing and smaller-scale investment managers.

Cautions regarding conclusions include:

  • Reported evidence is weakly quantitative. It is difficult to analyze long-run investing quantitatively because samples are always short relative to investment horizon.
  • To the extent the market is adaptive, returns of widely known factors diminish over the long run.
  • To the extent that researchers snoop, out-of-sample factor returns are lower than those implied by simple historical analysis.
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)