Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2022 (Final)

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2022 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

A Generation of Disappointed U.S. Equity Investors?

| | Posted in: Equity Premium

How have S&P 500 firms performed over the past two decades, in aggregate and individually, relative to reasonable investor expectations? In their February 2011 brief entitled “Shareholder Value Creators in the S&P 500: 1991-2010”, Pablo Fernandez, Javier Aguirreamalloa and Luis Corres tabulate the creation of value by major U.S. firms for long-term shareholders relative to a rationally constructed required rate of return for an equity investment. Using stock prices and capital flows for 644 firms assigned to the S&P 500 Index in 2004 or 2010, along with 10-year Treasury note (T-note) yields and equity risk premium estimates over the period 1991 through 2010, they find that:

  • Even though the aggregate market value of S&P 500 components grows from $2.8 trillion in 1991 to $11.4 trillion in 2010, these firms underperform reasonable investor rate of return requirements (T-note yield plus a modest equity risk premium) by $4.5 trillion.
  • The 2000-2010 subperiod exhibits a strong reversal of 1991-1999, with the former (latter) underperforming (outperforming) reasonable investor rate of return requirements by $9.6 trillion ($5.1 trillion).
  • Of the 644 firms in the S&P 500 in either 2004 or 2010, only 41% outperformed reasonable investor rate of return requirements during a 1993 through 2010 subperiod. During this subperiod:
    • The best outperformances are: Apple ($212 billion), Exxon Mobil ($86 billion), IBM ($78 billion), Altria Group ($70 billion) and Chevron ($67 billion).
    • The worst underperformances are: American International Group (-$217 billion), Pfizer (-$188 billion), General Electric (-$183 billion), Bank of America (-$170 billion), Citigroup (-$169 billion) and Time Warner (-$130 billion).

In summary, evidence indicates that reasonable rate of return expectations are not sufficient for formulating lifetime investment strategies.

Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)