Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2022 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2022 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Predicting the Equity Risk Premium

| | Posted in: Equity Premium

Does a simple model based on the gap between the stock market earnings yield and an inflation-adjusted Treasury yield usefully predict the equity risk premium (ERP)? In their June 2012 paper entitled “Equities (Still) for the Long Run: A New Look at the Future Equity Premium”, Michael Crook and Brian Nick construct and test a model that compares an estimate of the future stock market earnings yield to real bond return expectations. They use the S&P 500 as a proxy for the stock market. They estimate the future stock market earnings yield as the inverse of Shiller’s cyclically adjust price-earnings ratio (P/E10). They use nominal Treasury yields with duration matched to forecast horizon and adjust this yield with inflation expectations from the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. They apply simple inception-to-date linear regression to relate forecasted ERP to actual ERP. Using monthly S&P 500 Index total returns, Shiller’s P/E10 data, Treasury yields (10-year, 5-year and 2-year notes and bills) and the Cleveland Federal Reserve’s Index of Inflation (limiting the start of the sample period) during 1982 through April 2012, they find that:

  • Based on conventional statistical methods (R-squared statistics):
    • Relative to Treasury notes of matched duration, the model explains 10%/20%/40% of the future variability of 2-year/5-year/10-year annualized ERP.
    • Relative to Treasury bills, the model explains 30%/40%/70% of the future variability of 2-year/5-year/10-year annualized ERP.
  • ERP compression over the last decade is probably not a long-term structural change.
  • Stocks are presently cheap relative to Treasuries. Current ERP levels imply that stocks will outperform bonds by an annualized 6.7%, 6.4% and 5.8% over the next two, five and 10 years, respectively. A buy-and-hold equities strategy will likely be successful over the next decade.

In summary, evidence suggests that U.S. stocks are now priced attractively.

Cautions regarding findings include:

  • A multi-year annualized ERP forecast, which ignores intra-interval volatility, offers little support for tactical trading.
  • The sample period is short in terms of independent 10-year measurement intervals for P/E10 and multi-year annualized returns (only about three intervals for the former). The very large overlap in measurement intervals for monthly calculations may substantially inflate conventional correlations (and therefore R-squared statistics), thereby undermining hypothesis testing. This defect is worse for longer forecast horizons (greater measurement interval overlaps).
  • Use of indexes, which do not account for the costs of creating and maintaining tradable assets (trading frictions and management fees) may overstate achievable returns.
  • Testing multiple proxies (different Treasury instruments) for the risk-free rate on the same set of data introduces data snooping bias, such that the best proxy incorporates some luck.
  • It is arguable that an increase in the yield on each Treasury instrument, rather than a decrease in the stock market earnings yield, will close the gap between them.

For an alternative oriented toward tactical trading, see the Real Earnings Yield Model.

Login
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)