Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Poor Firm Management and Stock Returns

| | Posted in: Fundamental Valuation

Do negative environmental, social and governance (ESG) incidents (environmental pollution,
poor employment conditions or anti-competitive practices) indicate poor firm management and therefore underperforming stocks? In his February 2021 paper entitled “ESG Incidents and Shareholder Value”, Simon Glossner analyzes ESG incident data to determine whether: (1) history is predictive of future ESG incidents; (2) high incident rates impact firm performance: and, (3) the stock market prices incidents. Using over 80,000 incident news items, firm information and stock returns for 2,848 unique U.S. public firms starting January 2007 and a smaller sample for European firms starting January 2009, all through December 2017, he finds that:

  • U.S. ESG incidents triple from 2010 to 2014, suggesting increased attention to them. The worst industries for incidents are manufacturing, finance and mining.
  • A relatively high past ESG incident rate predicts a relatively high future rate, relatively weak future profitability and relatively low future risk-adjusted stock return.
    • A value-weighted portfolio of U.S. stocks in the top third of ESG incident rates generates -3.5% annualized 4-factor (market, size, book-to-market, momentum) alpha.
    • The corresponding annual alpha for European stocks is -2.5%.
  • Analysts apparently fail to understand the import of high past ESG incident rates. Firms with high rates generate annual abnormal returns of -1.4% after quarterly earnings announcements and -0.7% after subsequent incident news, accounting for three-fifths of underperformance.
  • The ESG incident rate effect is stronger among firms with relatively high short-term ownership, high valuation uncertainty and low investor attention.

In summary, evidence indicates that high ESG incident rates negatively impact long-term firm value, and this impact only gradually materializes in associated stock performance.

Cautions regarding findings include:

  • Concentration of incidents in the latter part of the sample suggests a very short effective sample period. The shortness of this effective sample raises the question of why the sample ends with 2017.
  • Reported returns are gross, not net. Trading frictions, shorting costs and cost of data/analysis would work against exploitation. Shorting costs may be high for firms with very high ESG incident rates.
  • Negative alpha does not mean negative return. Investors seeking to exploit the ESG incidents effect could consider: (1) a hedge portfolio that is long (short) stocks of firms with low (high) incident rates; and, (2) simply avoiding stocks of firms with high incident rates. The paper does not address these modes of exploitation.
  • Though the study finds that the ESG incident effect survives within industry, a portfolio of stocks for firms with high incident rates would exhibit industry concentration.
  • The methodology described is beyond the reach of most investors, who would bear fees for delegating portfolio development and maintenance to a fund manager.
Login
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)