Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
Cash TLT LQD SPY

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for December 2024 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Shorting Costs and Exploitation of Stock Anomalies

| | Posted in: Short Selling

Do anomaly portfolios that are long (short) the tenth, or decile, of stocks with the highest (lowest) expected value-weighted returns based on some firm accounting variable or stock behavior really work on a net basis? In the May 2019 version of their paper entitled “Shorting Costs and Profitability of Long-Short Strategies”, Dongcheol Kim and Byeung Joo Lee examine profitability of such portfolios after adjusting for: (1) unavailability of stocks to borrow for shorting as indicated; and, (2) stock loan fees paid to share lenders. They consider 14 value-weighted anomalies based on: return on assets, return on equity (ROE), momentum, net operating assets, investment-to-asset ratio, abnormal capital investment, accruals, asset growth, net stock issuance, composite equity issues, O-score, failure probability, gross profit and post-earnings announcement drift. They do not consider trading frictions (broker fees, bid-ask spread, impact of trading) incurred due to periodic reformation of anomaly portfolios. Using monthly stock prices and returns, data to construct value-weighted long-short anomaly portfolios, and share loan availability and fee data from Markit for a broad sample of U.S. stocks priced at least $1 during January 2006 through December 2017, they find that:

  • Average gross monthly return of the 14 long-short anomaly portfolios is 0.262%.
  • Average monthly shorting costs across anomalies are 0.029% and 0.075% for the two sources listed above, respectively. The total monthly shorting cost of 0.104% is about 40% of average gross anomaly monthly return.
  • Shorting costs represent about 25% of widely used 3-factor model (adjusting for market, size and book-to-market factors) alpha and 80% of a 4-factor model (adjusting for market, size, investment-to-asset ratio and ROE) alpha.
  • Incorporation of trading frictions for periodic reformation of anomaly portfolios would further reduce profitability.

In summary, evidence from actual shorting costs/constraints undermines belief in net profitability of long-short stock anomaly strategies.

For related research, see:

Login
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)