Objective research to aid investing decisions

Value Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for May 2020 (Preliminary)
Cash TLT LQD SPY

Momentum Investing Strategy (Strategy Overview)

Allocations for May 2020 (Final)
1st ETF 2nd ETF 3rd ETF

Safe Retirement Withdrawal Rate?

| | Posted in: Strategic Allocation

In the current environment of low bond yields, what is a safe investment withdrawal rate during retirement? In their January 2013 paper entitled “The 4% Rule is Not Safe in a Low-Yield World”, Michael Finke, Wade Pfau and David Blanchett model the risk of exhausting wealth for different retirement durations, withdrawal rates, stocks-bonds portfolio mixes and assumptions about future market conditions (stock and bond returns). They model retirement portfolio dynamics via Monte Carlo simulations applied to log-normal return distributions, based on an inflation-adjusted withdrawal rate set at a percentage of investment portfolio value at retirement and annual rebalancing to a target asset allocation (with failure whenever a withdrawal results in a zero balance). They assume withdrawals cover any taxes due and ignore any portfolio fees/frictions. They focus on a 30-year retirement under current market conditions, with bonds yielding an average annual real return of -1.4% (based on current yields for 5-year Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) and stocks yielding an average annual real return of 4.6% (6.0% equity risk premium over the bond yield). They also consider a case based on 1926-2011 average annual real returns of 2.6% for bonds and 8.6% for stocks, and cases for which current low returns revert to historical averages five or ten years into retirement. Using the specified modeling assumptions and parameters, they find that:

  • Based on the conventional 4% withdrawal rate over a 30-year retirement, with stock allocations of 30%, 50% or 70%, retirement portfolio failure rates are:
    • 6%, 6% and 8%, respectively, assuming historical average annual real returns of 8.6% for stocks and 2.6% for bonds.
    • 47%, 33% and 28%, respectively, assuming 6% average annual real returns for stocks and 0% for bonds.
    • 77%, 57% and 46%, respectively, assuming the current annual real returns of 4.6% for stocks and -1.4% for bonds.
    • 22%, 18% and 18%, respectively, assuming the current annual real returns for the first five years of retirement and historical returns for the next 25 years.
  • Based on a 4% withdrawal rate over a 30-year retirement under current market conditions (annual real returns of 4.6% for stocks and -1.4% for bonds), even the optimal allocation of 100% to stocks results in a 40% retirement portfolio failure rate (see the chart below).
  • For 95% assurance that the retirement portfolio will not fail, the maximum sustainable withdrawal rates and optimal stocks/bonds allocations are:
    • 5.0% withdrawal rate and 27%/73% stocks/bonds allocations for a 15-year retirement.
    • 3.6% and 32%/68% for a 20-year retirement.
    • 2.7% and 33%/67% for a 25-year retirement.
    • 2.2% and 44%/56% for a 30-year retirement.
  • Assuming current market conditions persist, replacing bonds with single-premium annuities (for longevity protection) may improve retirement outcomes.

The following chart, taken from the paper, plots retirement portfolio failure rates during a 30-year retirement for stock allocations ranging from 0% to 100% and withdrawal rates (WR) ranging from 3% to 6% under current market conditions (annual real returns of 4.6% for stocks and -1.4% for bonds). Squares indicate the stock allocations for different WRs that minimize portfolio failure rates. For example, even a 3% WR with optimal 70% allocation to stocks results in a portfolio failure rate over 20%. The probability of exhausting wealth during retirement for the conventional 4% WR and allocations of 60% stocks/40% bonds is 50% .

retirement-portfolio-failure-rates

In summary, modeling based on current U.S. bond and stock market returns indicates that the safe investment withdrawal rate over a lengthy retirement is much lower than the conventional 4% of wealth at retirement.

Cautions regarding findings include:

  • As noted, analyses assume that withdrawals pay for taxes and optimistically ignore portfolio fees/frictions.
  • The assumption of a 6.0% U.S. equity risk premium based on historical data may be optimistic.
  • Analyses assume tame return distributions. To the extent that actual distributions are wild, the modeling methodology breaks down.
  • Spending requirements may vary considerably during retirement, as addressed in “Allocating Assets for Retirement”, such that a constant withdrawal rate does not match needs.
Login
Daily Email Updates
Filter Research
  • Research Categories (select one or more)