Equity Premium

Do exchange-traded funds (ETF) designed to make private equity available to individual investors beat the market? To investigate, we consider five ETFs, as follows:

• • Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PSP) – invests in 40 to 75 private equity companies, including business development companies, master limited partnerships, alternative asset managers and other entities that are listed on a nationally recognized exchange.
  • iShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (IPRV) – tracks the return of the S&P Listed Private Equity Index via exposure to large, liquid and listed private equity companies in developed markets that invest directly into or buy out private companies.
  • VanEck BDC Income ETF (BIZD) – invests at least 80% of its total assets in securities associated with its benchmark (Business Development Company) index.
  • ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) – invests in the most actively traded private equity companies that directly hold private equity, or in instruments with similar economic characteristics.
  • FlexShares Listed Private Equity UCITS ETF (FLPE) – tracks price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Foxberry Listed Private Equity SDG Screened USD Net Total Return Index.

We use Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund ETF (VTI) as the benchmark. We focus on monthly return statistics, along with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) and maximum drawdowns (MaxDD). Using monthly total returns for the five private equity ETFs and VTI as available through March 2025, we find that:

Keep Reading

Subscribers asked whether substituting Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) for SPDR S&P 500 (SPY) in the Simple Asset Class ETF Value Strategy (SACEVS) and the Simple Asset Class ETF Momentum Strategy (SACEMS) improves outcomes. To investigate, we substitute monthly QQQ dividend-adjusted returns for SPY dividend-adjusted returns in the two model strategies. We then compare the modified performance with the original baseline performance, including: gross compound annual growth rates (CAGR) at various horizons, average gross annual returns, standard deviations of gross annual returns, gross annual Sharpe ratios and maximum drawdowns (MaxDD) based on monthly measurements. In Sharpe ratio calculations, we employ the average monthly yield on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills during a year as the risk-free rate for that year. Using the specified methodology and data to generate SACEVS monthly returns starting August 2002 and SACEMS monthly returns starting July 2006, all through March 2025, we find that:

Keep Reading

What are the different ways of estimating the equity risk premium, and which one is best? In his March 2025 paper entitled “Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation, and Implications – The 2025 Edition”, Aswath Damodaran updates a comprehensive overview of equity risk premium estimation. He examines why different approaches to estimating the premium disagree and how to choose among them. Using data from multiple countries (but focusing on the U.S.) over long periods through the end of 2024, he concludes that: Keep Reading

Are plans to use nuclear power to provide electricity for proliferating data centers driving attractive performance for uranium exchange-traded-funds (ETF)? To investigate, we consider four such ETFs, all currently available:

• VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF ETF (NLR) – picks stocks and depositary receipts of firms involved in uranium and nuclear energy.
• Global X Uranium ETF (URA) – picks stocks of global companies involved in the uranium industry.
• Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) – picks stocks of firms devoting at least 50% of assets to mining of uranium, holding physical uranium, owning uranium royalties or engaging in other activities that support uranium mining.
• Sprott Junior Uranium Miners ETF (URNJ) – picks stocks of small firms devoting at least 50% of assets to mining of uranium, holding physical uranium, owning uranium royalties or engaging in other activities that support uranium mining.

We use Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) as a benchmark. We also look at some performance results for SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) for perspective. We focus on monthly return statistics, along with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) and maximum drawdowns (MaxDD). Using monthly total returns for the four uranium ETFs as available and for XLE and SPY through February 2025, we find that: Keep Reading

A subscriber asked about an assertion that bitcoin (BTC) price trend/return predicts return of the S&P 500 Index (SP500). To investigate, we relate BTC returns to SP500 returns at daily, weekly and monthly frequencies. We rationalize the different trading schedules for these two series by excluding BTC trading dates that are not also SP500 trading days. Most results are conceptual, but we test three versions of an SP500 timing strategy based on prior BTC returns focused on compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and maximum drawdown (MaxDD). Using daily SP500 levels and (pruned) BTC prices during 9/17/2014 (limited by the BTC series) through 3/18/2025, we find that:

Keep Reading

The “Simple Asset Class ETF Value Strategy” (SACEVS) seeks diversification across a small set of asset class exchanged-traded funds (ETF), plus a monthly tactical edge from potential undervaluation of three risk premiums:

1. Term – monthly difference between the 10-year Constant Maturity U.S. Treasury note (T-note) yield and the 3-month Constant Maturity U.S. Treasury bill (T-bill) yield.
2. Credit – monthly difference between the Moody’s Seasoned Baa Corporate Bonds yield and the T-note yield.
3. Equity – monthly difference between S&P 500 operating earnings yield and the T-note yield.

Premium valuations are relative to historical averages. How might this strategy react to changes in the Effective Federal Funds Rate (EFFR)? Using end-of-month values of the three risk premiums, EFFR, total 12-month U.S. inflation and core 12-month U.S. inflation during March 1989 (limited by availability of operating earnings data) through February 2025, we find that: Keep Reading

A buffer exchange-traded fund (ETF) is designed to limit losses while capping gains over a specific period, usually one year, generally by combining a position in put and call options on a stock index with an ETF that tracks that index. Laddered buffer ETFs smooth this approach by holding a rolling series of buffer ETFs with staggered expiration dates, thereby imposing two layers of fund costs. How do laddered buffer ETFs perform? To investigate, we consider five of the largest such ETFs, all currently available, as follows:

• • FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF (BUFR)
  • Pacer Swan SOS Fund of Funds ETF (PSFF)
  • FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF (BUFD)
  • Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF (BUFB)
  • FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF (BUFQ)

We use SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) as the benchmark for the first four and Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ) for the last. We focus on monthly return statistics, along with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) and maximum drawdowns (MaxDD). Using monthly total returns for the five laddered buffer ETFs, SPY and QQQ as available through February 2025, we find that:

Keep Reading

Are all stocks except U.S. growth cheap? In his brief February 2025 paper entitled “Decomposing Equity Returns: Earnings Growth vs. Multiple Expansion”, David Blitz decomposes equity returns of different global equity markets and styles (size, low-volatility, value) into dividend yield, earnings growth and multiple expansion. The decomposition consists of:

• Subtracting price return from total return to derive the contribution from dividends.
• Calculating the part of price return due to earnings growth.
• Attributing the part of price return not due to earnings growth to multiple expansion/contraction based on change in price-to-earnings ratio (P/E).

The breakdown exposes different reasons for underperformance of markets and styles relative to the U.S. equity market. Using the specified data for 2015 through 2024, he finds that: Keep Reading

How do returns of different asset classes recently interact with inflation as measured by monthly change in the not seasonally adjusted, all-items consumer price index (CPI) from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics? To investigate, we look at lead-lag relationships between change in CPI and returns for each of the following 10 exchange-traded fund (ETF) asset class proxies:

• Equities:
  • SPDR S&P 500 (SPY)
  • iShares Russell 2000 Index (IWM)
  • iShares MSCI EAFE Index (EFA)
  • iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index (EEM)
• Bonds:
  • iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond (TLT)
  • iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD)
  • iShares JPMorgan Emerging Markets Bond Fund (EMB)
• Real assets:
  • Vanguard REIT ETF (VNQ)
  • SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)
  • Invesco DB Commodity Index Tracking (DBC)

Using monthly total CPI values and monthly dividend-adjusted prices for the 10 specified ETFs during December 2007 (limited by EMB) through January 2025, we find that: Keep Reading

A subscriber requested measurement of a “premium” associated with U.S. stocks relative to those of other developed markets by looking at the difference in returns between the following two exchange-traded funds (ETF):

• SPDR S&P 500 (SPY)
• iShares MSCI EAFE Index Fund (EFA)

Using monthly dividend-adjusted closing prices for these ETFs during August 2001 (limited by EFA) through January 2025, we find that: Keep Reading