Objective research and reviews to aid investing decisions
Does the Wall Street Journal's SmartMoney Fund Screen help its readers beat the market? In the February 2008 version of their paper entitled "Do Mutual Fund Media Recommendations Hold Value? An Empirical Analysis of the Wall Street Journal’s SmartMoney Fund Screen", George Comer, Norris Larrymore and Javier Rodriguez employ two methods to test the performance of mutual funds listed at the ends of the Wall Street Journal's SmartMoney Fund Screen columns during the year before and the year after publication. These weekly columns flag top performing mutual funds based on criteria such as fund objective, historical returns and expense ratios. The authors collect and assign the funds in these lists to one of five fund categories: domestic equity, international equity, sector, hybrid (asset allocation and balanced funds) and fixed income. Using daily returns for 399 mutual funds (263 unique) listed during 2005, they conclude that:
In summary, the Wall Street Journal's SmartMoney Fund Screen column may have value for picking international and hybrid mutual funds. It is probably not useful for picking domestic equity, sector or fixed income funds, for which strong past performance does not persist after publication.
For related research, see Blog Synthesis: Mutual Funds and Hedge Funds and Blog Synthesis: The Wisdom of Analysts, Experts and Gurus.