Objective research and reviews to aid investing decisions
Is there a way to end the endless debate on the merits of technical analysis? In his September 2006 paper entitled "On the Analogy Between Scientific Study of Technical Analysis and Ethnopharmacology", Waldemar Stronka proposes bringing technical analysis into the financial economics fold in a manner analogous to the successful incorporation of folk medicine by pharmacology. Specifically, he notes that:
"...[O]ne of the greatest gulfs between academic finance and industry practice is the separation that exists between technical analysts and their academic critics. In contrast to fundamental analysis, which was quick to be adopted by the scholars of modern quantitative finance, technical analysis has been an orphan from the very start. It has been argued that the difference between fundamental analysis and technical analysis is not unlike the difference between astronomy and astrology." [quoting Lo, Mamaysky and Wang]
There are four areas of similarity between folk medicine and technical analysis:
There are also some areas of difference between folk medicine and technical analysis:
The essential lessons from folk medicine for testing of technical analysis are:
In summary, the incorporation of folk medicine by pharmacology offers a model for bringing technical analysis into the financial economics fold.
This paper provides a thoughtful framework for thinking about the state of financial economics.
For related research, see:
Blog Synthesis: Big Ideas for Investing/Trading; and,
Blog Synthesis: Some Trading Indicators, especially our blog entries of 4/11/05 and 9/18/06 on the testing of technical analysis.